On Principle

Reading other people's cryptic, often funny comments on items in the News, I'm left wondering what ever happened to principles. Not wishing to mention names or instances here, because everyone has different views and reactions, and there's a danger of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, alienating readers with something that simply is not the main issue.

Decisions don't seem to be made with other people's welfare in mind. Discretion doesn't seem to prevail either, so we are no longer left to muse and mutter darkly, but bombarded with conflicting information and animosity.

Dipping into some of it tonight, a number of names of people whose clarity of argument and writing really impressed me, have come up with huge question marks beside them. I have been in the same room while some of them have turned a discussion round to their way of thinking (or someone's with clout), ridiculing anyone and everyone tempted to have a wee doubt or two.

OK, we are all grown-up and responsible for making up our own minds. Why then, do some organisers 'employ' such clever and persuasive people, to put on a show to sway opinion, years before anything hit the fan more prominently? What are we to think, years down the line, when such names crop up in connection with, perhaps mixing with or defending people whose reputations are now challenged by questions of their integrity, and alleged involvement in serious matters that, had we known about them at the time, would have demolished respect? Do we now respect those who long ago, tried to get a roomful of us laughing at their wit? I do not decry all of the work they have done before or since. I don't know how, once in a while, they are not meeting themselves coming backwards on the other side of an argument.

Is it a class act, do you think? Or how useful one can be, for now? We write for those who fall foul of it, and cannot fathom why, or why they don't snitch on each other: a foul is a foul, after all. Do family or social bonds hold most sway, the type of school one attended, the accent one speaks with? Perhaps it is who one knows. Or what they know or assume about us, and think they will override. Or not, meaning they give us a wide berth. We think ourselves lucky then!

I wonder about the mechanics - should that read machinations? - and people, behind the scenes.

It Depends What You Believe

And on what others can get us to believe, somehow, anyhow, every which way.

I came to these Blogs halfway through. Just because a book or author is mentioned here or elsewhere, does not mean (a) I/ we understand it, or (b) agree with it. Things spark off an idea, and may be of interest or use to someone else. As you yourself are searching, all sorts of different stuff will impinge on your mind leading to other ideas, or a complete turnaround.

When the whole New Age thing started, it seemed a great way to be more accepting of other thinking and ways. The Internet meant people could find information, contact people anywhere, whether they could travel or their health let them do much, and share notes or argue without the same personal risk.

It would be good if the extra potential had been as beneficial as we thought, but there were more options in a vastly different playing-field. I was left to my own devices as a stubborn youngster, at a time when children were free to roam and choose their friends, so I ploughed into things while keeping one foot on dry land - through fear. From an interest in the weird and wacky, I saw patterns of thinking and themes, suggesting things were often not as they seemed or were portrayed. My point in doing what I do, is a strong belief that people should be free to make up their minds without fear or favour. And to change them, not have someone make us comply. Or get in under our natural defences without our realising.

You've heard of Softly, Softly, Catchee Monkey. Well there is worse than that afoot.

Whether you have any interest in religion, there is talk about an Antichrist looming on the scene, and gory scary films about possession and ghouls. Thomas Horn, mentioned above, and authors he collaborates with, think there will be such a person or event arriving soon, seemingly the answer to our needs while having other designs. They reckon on there being other, lesser players of an antichrist type, including the World Wide Web in the scheme. (I think I already met some!)

And it all ties in with artificial intelligence, even implants into humans, worldwide surveillance and control, enforced vaccinations. Think coronavirus,  compulsory testing, immunity passes, not to mention constraints being imposed and changed over and over. Other countries have hit trouble with a further rise in infections, at a time when England are opening up/ forcing open many more avenues. People are naturally sceptical and scared. At least most of us got some facemasks and food in.

Is It A Virus Though?

Although I would not be able hand-on-heart to claim I believe the coronavirus situation is a hoax, I cannot ignore some points made by the author of this book, and some others. It's over to you.

by Nicholas Kollerstrom

We do need to know what exactly is being tested, and whether it is accurate or merely as close as we can get at this stage. Figures of the spread are mounting but, if one takes into account what doesn't add up, well it doesn't. Just do your best to protect yourselves.

It Also Depends What You Need!

Almost a Year since we heard of Coronavirus, there is conflict over what's best for most people, or some groups/'cohorts', even what is possible. We've been spooked by higher fines for transgressing what's often guidance rather than actual law (but don't hold your breath). If we blink, might we fall foul of an earnest police officer or Covid marshall, with a different view of our 'reasonable excuse' for taking the air? Might our emails or Zoom calls be compromised?

In England, we seem caught between 'the devil and the deep blue sea'. Reopen schools, and people claim it'll cause more spread of infection. Keep them closed, and there's worry over isolating children from friends, education, wellbeing or safety. Safety of vaccines is an issue, as we hear of health hazards or deaths of young and old alike, occurring shortly afterwards. Older people are thought at greater risk, both from getting Covid and getting the jab, so there's been some backtracking. People over 70 or of whatever age or category with concerns, are called 'vaccine resistant', as in denial, or purveyors of false information. So do they need to be wary of 'persuaders' ready to turn up at their door, or a nice-looking doctor there to vaccinate them at home, the military ready to test them, or ....? Surge testing is put in place when even one person in a region is thought to be infected with a variant strain.

On 'variant strains', according to reputable virologists, UK are taking risks by delaying the second dose from something like 3 weeks to 3 months, and even using a different vaccine from the one given as first dose. Not enough is known yet, so find out what you can to make up your own mind. Otherwise it is not informed consent. There could be problems over further mutant strains, over apparently requiring a vaccination (what kind?), every year from now on. Etc. Young children in some parts of US and UK, will be part of an experiment over vaccination.

These things are why this Blog exists, and why many people are raising concerns -  before it's Too Late to avoid possible complications. An irony is that, if one stays home for around 10 days, it should be evident that infection is no big problem. But if you get vaccinated, you can then start testing positive, or can spread infection.

Protect Yourself

See On Protection post at https://notincharacter.blogspot.com/2019/01/blog-post_28.html

Measures & Countermeasures
http://toukanalia.50megs.com/createyours/measures.html

For biological/technical methods of control, please go to revised Blog https://doubledstandards.blogspot.com and scroll to Invasive Technology.

Doubled Standards

From: https://doubledstandards.blogspot.com

You know that feeling when something just doesn't add up right. Way down the line, it is more like a complete reversal of what is claimed, and you don't know what took you so long! People make a thing about official denials, because so often they are par for the course after allegations are mooted. Let's not get into a double-bind here.

Reversals

We likely all have our main bugbears about things and people. Something that has bothered me is a double standard in social work, helping people or not, and whether the wish really is for someone's life to improve. I first came across double standards when visiting people in mental health wards, and being somewhat in awe of social workers' knowledge. The patients quickly explained: 'We're just a number on a file to them. Don't be fooled.' Fortunately, I also met good professionals, and that stays with me.

Recently, I had an idea to pull together some threads from books on why crimes against children, in particular, were not prosecuted more, considering how many are involved, and the sexual nature. Recent books I had were painstaking and explicit, suggesting murders and cover-ups, with instigators or main perpetrators leading a charmed life as far as law enforcement were concerned. How? Why? Ferreting for slghtly older books on a relevant theme, a significant number were currently unavailable, with no Used options. I have hard copies of half, and half on Kindle that haven't been withdrawn - yet. Authors can have their own reasons for rethinking what they want to be public, or may not want to continue a theme. But if they went to a great deal of trouble and risk to warn us over something that could be important, this seems odd to me. I take my hat off to those who laboured to give what they have, many of whom suffered for their pains.

Some authors get a bad reputation through things in their personal lives, or are falsely smeared in an attempt to discredit their message, or perhaps a co-author. Some authors fall out with a line of enquiry, or perhaps with a co-worker. Some people's work goes by the board, where others put efforts into further research that proves well-founded. Who can tell sometimes till it happens? What does seem a shame is when anyone would go to the lengths of making things up wholesale, or to justify something that they realise is not true. And sometimes, it's simply that no-one really knows enough to say.

Earth Energies

Writers include: Sesh Heri, Walter Bosley, Bruce Cathie, Andrew Collins, Toyne Newton. Also look for work on ancient mounds, latitude 33 and so on. Some writers claim that certain occult practitioners add their rituals to Planetary factors, combining them with Earth currents, blocking them in key places, or using sacrifices to make their own activities more effective.

See also Blog https://groupsandminds.blogspot.com posts at the bottom on End Times and Exopolitics.

Anyone interested in biological/technical methods of control, please go to revised Blog https://doubledstandards.blogspot.com and scroll to Invasive Technology.

Most pages have a selection of relevant books that you may not have come across, including on coronavirus, End Times, mind control - what we're calling Mindcluk, cuckooing of the mind.

Why Are Some Crimes Not Prosecuted?

See Eaters of Children: The Pedocracy Exposed by Giovanni Johnny Cirucci.

Not only are some perpetrators against children being effectively let off, in some countries through statute of limitatations, but questions have been raised about some serial killers, and whether sometimes a case has been considered solved, when other evidence could have been overlooked, as in 'It's not what you know (or did), it's who you know.' Freemasonry means different things to different people, and conspiracy writers point to strange happenings or undue influence, such as in business or Police matters. There are countless other groups offering social, moral or practical support to their members, some with a particular focus, and some quite cult-like.

It can also be What the other People are Involved in. That does not necessarily imply their involvement or collusion in child abuse or the murder of children, for instance, but those can be a key part of other serious issues that can impact even further. I always aim not to mention people by name, or by religious group, or anything of a specific nature, even to 'mutter darkly' as if I know things other people don't. However, some authors do name names, or whole belief systems for instance. (Maybe that's why some books are 'unavailable'.) When several authors appear independently to find information that seems to support a theory or theme, are we looking at something real? Does someone who tends to a particular faith or belief system, believe exactly the same as other participants?

Writers such as Leo Zagami, Isaac Weishaupt, suggest that the Vatican has become influenced by other forces, to the point where it is nothing like people think, a total 'Reversal'. This is particularly relevant to the many allegations of child sexual abuse. Illuminati means different things to people, some claiming it began as a movement to inform and empower ordinary people, a forerunner to WikiLeaks. Read up on Mind Control. Look at the work of R.A. Chamberlin, and Truthspoon. Also Texe Marrs, Jim Marrs, Thomas Horn, Nick Redfern, Mike Bara. Could it be, as some conspiratorial writers claim, that people of particular bloodlines are genetically different from most of us, and work together to ensure their own survival and privilege?

Some writers do a grand job of putting together multiple ideas and information, leading to the work of other writers. Then they seem to go off, collaborating with others who maybe don't seem so reliable. Use what you can, and above all, Make Up Your Own Mind. We're betting on probabilities.


Below is a rather scary image of a book:

Thought Forms and Psychogons: (about studies and practices with psychogons) by Alfred Ballabene 

If you search around you can download a free .pdf version with drawings that make it more meaningful. Some of it is along the lines of the Leadbeater book on thoughtforms, emotions and so on. It could be that there are collections of energy either in someone's aura, or present nearby, or linked, that we actually are reacting to as if we could see them with ordinary sight. Another avenue to look at is things like entities or servitors, that are created with a specific task to perform. How do we know that some people don't just do this automatically to fulfil a need, without ever opening a magic book? It's my belief this happens more than we know.

Some families have strong traditions, and may have violent emotions. It sometimes seems these pass from generation to generation, with positive or negative consequences, having significant effects on those they come in contact with. It is not at a conscious level, and therefore may be more powerful, so the impact on others can be very much like a deliberate curse. OK, so you don't believe in them, but wait till you meet something otherwise inexplicable! Then start looking to some form of protection.

Next, I draw your attention to author Mark Stavish. He is an esoteric writer and has a YouTube channel, but is able to explain things in a way that ordinary folks can understand. He writes about egregores, or group-minds of various kinds What interested me is his little book on poltergeists and obsessions, with sections on other authors whose work I had turned to in an attempt to get an inkling. I also have a thing about protecting oneself, and he has another book on that.

There seem to be situations and people, where none of the usual ideas work to explain things, or to improve them for someone, or for oneself. I don't believe in messing about in things I do not understand, but unless we consider some things outside-the-box, we will never learn.

Some writers are into Earth energies and so on, and one would have to be pretty hard-nosed not to consider that these, plus Planetary energies or configurations could explain some of the otherwise inexplicable.

See What About Forensic Astrology? at https://notincharacter.blogspot.com/2019/01/blog-post_33.html


To get back to where this all started:

Are we effectively 'cuckooed' by other people's needs, conscious or not? Do they somehow infiltrate our own brain (or other) circuits, so we don't really know what to think for a while? Is this how cults work? or coercive situations like scams, or fraudulent relationships? A key thing to remember, however close you are to someone, or if you are being bullied, is to keep some of your circuits able to function. Go for a walk, hold something comforting or meaningful, give yourself a brief respite.

What Is Character?

For some posts on Character, and whether we sometimes behave very differently, see the NotInCharacter site which links to sequel GroupsandMinds, and then to notes on Protection/Personal Boundaries.